SEC Cites “Confusion” for ETF Trading Suspension

SEC Suspends Bitcoin and Ether Tracker one

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has halted trading of Bitcoin Tracker One and Ether Tracker One due to “…confusion amongst market participants regarding these financial instruments,” according to an official statement. Both financial products are currently traded on the NASDAQ‘s Nordic exchange based in Stockholm and have been listed on OTC Link, a part of OTC Markets Group.

The organization cited the Security Exchange Act of 1934 as the overriding authority. They also claimed that the initial financial materials surrounding these products label them as exchange-traded funds, while other documents describe them as exchange-traded notes. The issuer, however, characterizes them as non-equity linked certificates.

 

 

Bitcoin Tracker One Ether Tracker One XBT Provider
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Buffer
  • reddit
  • LinkedIn
XBTprovider is behind the Bitcoin and Ethereum financial products. Image Credit: XBT Provider/xbt.net

XBT Clarifies Suspension Terms

XBT Provider AB, the Sweden based issuer of both Bitcoin Tracker One and Ether Tracker One, clarified in a Sept. 10 statement that the temporary trading suspension issued by the SEC only affects trading within the U.S. and not on the NASDAQ Stockholm listing market. XBT also noted that the suspension “…does not relate to any action taken or failed to be taken by XBT Provider AB,” and that “it is our understanding that this action by the US Securities and Exchange Commission was taken due to possible confusion in the US market regarding these securities. XBT Provider AB has not sought registration or trading of these securities in the US and has no responsibility to provide any information with respect thereto to US market participants.”

In other words, because XBT has not sought SEC approval for its products, the required information surrounding the products falls squarely on individual broker-deals.

ETFs Versus Non-Equity Certificates

Exchange traded funds are an investment vehicle that rose to prominence in the 1980s as an alternative to mutual funds. They consist of a linked group of stocks bundled with relatively low management fees and a greater degree of intraday price visibility. The trade-off with exchange-traded funds is their reliance on the individual investor to pick the correct exchange-traded fund for market conditions and his or her investment style. Investors have long clamored for Bitcoin to be treated as an ETF, and the SEC’s unwillingness to do is partially blamed for the currency’s protracted bear market over the course of 2018.

Non-equity linked certificates, on the other hand, are a form of security more closely linked to bonds. They are frequently shopped to investors as a method of raising initial capital, and they are not traded on financial market exchanges.

The SEC has been taking an increasingly active role in cryptocurrency regulation since U.S. tax and regulatory rules were clarified last year. The organization has yet to issue a sweeping ruling that would regulate crypto into oblivion, or set it free on the trade winds of the open market, but has settled for a piecemeal, case by case approach, much to the consternation of those in the industry who have little certainty whether their next step forward will take them down a sinkhole of legal problems.

 

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Buffer
  • reddit
  • LinkedIn

Previous ArticleNext Article
Cedric Jackson is a contributing writer at BlockTelegraph. His writing draws on his rich life experiences, time spent traveling, and years working with the written word. He is passionate about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, finance, and markets. When not busy writing, he spends his time traveling, reading and keeping up with world events.

Join Our Mailing List

Keep up with the latest in FinTech, Blockchain, and Crypto.

You have Successfully Subscribed!